| |
When
volunteers with little flags and donation boxes come to us and
we contribute our mite to the Armed Forces Welfare Funds on
the Flag Day in December, they also raise a question. How well
are we? Is the civil society aware of our debt to those
magnificent men in the Army, Navy and Air Force uniforms? The
understanding, support and care offered by the civil society
strengthens the will and faith of the soldier to defend his
country on land, sea and air.
And when you put on your
awareness cap and think of the defenders of the peace and
security of India, your thoughts go to those who defended the
Kashmir Valley in 1947 and those who rid of Kargil heights of
aggression only recently. That was not the first major
aggression they fought against with determination and valour
and came out winners. They had also defended the country in
the 1962, 1965 and 1971 wars. With a unilateral peace
initiative declared by India, they are today fighting a war of
courageous patience. Only the strong and the courageous can
declare and maintain unilateral ceasefire to diffuse a
situation of continuous conflict. The Indian Army, the senior
most and the largest of the three defence services of the
country, has also become the most experienced force in
combating terrorism and disruption in its role of aid to civil
administration.
As an impressive
peacekeeping forces of the United Nations, this Army has
played its role in Korea, the Congo, the Ghaza Strip and in
several other areas of peacekeeping operations in Asia, Africa
and Europe. The Indian Army has also earned itself a special
place in the field of adventure sport. All these things and a
very special Indianness makes this army like no other army.
Its soldiers speak more than 40 different languages and
dialects. They come from almost all the major religions and
ethnic groups, everyone with its own tradition of value and
valour. That is why in times of calamity and disaster it has
ever acted as the most courageous and competent rescue and
relief force.
Looking
back, one would notice that when India inherited its present
Army from the British in 1947, it was quite different. It was
an army commanded by and large by non-Indians. Till India’s
freedom, the British made it a point that while they commanded
this army, no Indian could become a company or squadron
commander even though senior enough. Promotion was strictly
controlled. As well known military historian, Lt Col Gautam
Sharma (Retd) has pointed out in his excellent work, Nationalisation
of the Indian Army (1885-1947) "We inherited the
present Indian Army in 1947 and within a couple of months we
had to fight a war which lasted full 14 months under the most
unfavourable conditions. The armed forces had been split. We
were short of officers, VCOs and NCOs who were war veterans
and had gone over or left. There had also been large scale
disbandments. The Indian officers had no experience of leading
brigades, divisions and armies in battle. Many had to be
promoted mostly two or three ranks higher and they acquitted
themselves well".
The British had made it
a point to ensure that the command of the Indian Army always
stayed with them. The men were enrolled from certain classes
called martial. Quite a large number of them were from the
higher strata. They were given direct commissions as Jemadars
and Risaldars and addressed as "saheb". The angrez
log were "sahebs" and the rank with the prefix
gave the Indian recipients a "British" sense of
pride and status. In time to come, they were promoted but had
no authority. The seniormost of these with 30-35 years service
were subordinate to the juniormost British officers. The
British also downgraded the great traditional Indian army
ranks. They downgraded the senapati, commander of a
large army, as naik who commanded just ten jawans. For
example, Dhokil Singh, later a General in the Sikh Army, was a
Drill Naik and Raja Bakhtawar Singh of Oudh a Havildar.
It was for Gen K M
Cariappa, the first Indian Commander-in-Chief of the Indian
Army, to set the course of the "nationalisation" of
the Indian Army. The General, a true father figure for the
Independent India’s Army, later honoured by the rank of
Field Marshal for his achievement in building a truly Indian
command for the Indian Army, was responsible for giving the
nation a truly "national army". It was this
evolution of the new command which led to the historic 1971
victory of India under Gen Sam Manekshaw who was honoured by
being made the first Field Marshal even before Cariappa.
The 1971 performance of
the Indian Army was impressive in many ways. The largest ever
territory of the aggressor was occupied by the Indian Army in
the western Sector in operations led by Lt Gen K P Candeth. In
the Eastern Sector, operations commanded by Lt Gen Jagjit
Singh Arora led to the unprecedented surrender of the 80,000-
strong Pakistani army commanded by Lt Gen A K Niazi. The
conflict led to the emergence of Independent Bangladesh and
the release of the father of Bangladesh, Bangabandhu Sheikh
Mujib-ur-Rehman. Even more impressive than the 1971 victory
was the smooth and unilateral return of the occupied territory
and prisoners of war by the political and military leadership
of India as a gesture of goodwill and good neighbourliness.
With the quality of
leadership of the Indian Army, the indigenisation of its
infrastructure and equipment also underwent steady change and
development. It was no longer the old infantry based force of
foot-soldiers. Infantry evolved into mechanical infantry-well
equipped and well-trained. Old Cavalry transformed itself into
impressive Armour. Indian-made missiles, radar and signal
systems and a variety of arms, ammunition matching the needs
and threat perceptions of Indian strategists were designed,
developed and inducted into the Army. For this, one has to
give credit to more than three dozen departmental and nearly a
dozen Defence undertakings and almost three dozen research
laboratories, dotted all over the country. They improved the
effectiveness of our weapons and enabled our brave jawans and
officers to fight better.
A military machine is as
good as the heroic men behind it. The Indian Army has a great
galaxy of heroes esteemed for their bravery and patriotism by
the nation. Selection of a few names would show that they
belong to not one community or religion. They were Indians
first and Indians last. Just think of Hav Abdul Hamid, Brig
Usman, L/Nk Karam Singh, Sub Joginder Singh, Nb Sub Bana
Singh, Maj Ramaswami Parmeshwaran, Maj Somnath Sharma, Maj
Dhan Singh Thapa, Lt Col A B Tarapore, 2/Lt Rama Ragnoba Rane
and L/Nk Albert Eka. The golden list of heroes and martyrs is
a long one. These are just some of the names that flash across
the mind.
And then there is the great Indian ethos
on the question why wars must be fought at all. The Geeta is
perhaps the oldest and the most impressive dialogue written on
the battlefield of Kurukshetra between a reluctant commander
Arjuna and his moral and strategic preceptor, Krishna. It
gives the moral and ethical elements governing the act of war
as an act of duty, faith and justice. Unlike the Russian
military philosopher and strategist Karl Clausewitcz, the
Indian view does not consider war as a blind state act to
establish domination and a political instrument for expansion.
India and the Indian Army has never believed in war for war’s
sake. It believes in war for self-defence, peace and security.
And this is how our Army is unlike any other army.
|